REPORT

A New Climate for Peace

Taking Action on Climate and Fragility Risks

This independent report, commissioned by the G7 members, identifies seven compound climate-fragility risks that pose serious threats to the stability of states and societies in the decades ahead. Based on a thorough assessment of existing policies on climate change adaptation, development cooperation and humanitarian aid, and peacebuilding, the report recommends that the G7 take concrete action, both as individual members and jointly, to tackle climate-fragility risks and increase resilience to them.

BLOG

Resilience Compass

When climate change exacerbates conflicts and crises, resilience must be the compass for foreign policy. The Resilience Compass features news, reflections and opinions on climate change and fragility, with contributions from the Wilson Center’s New Security Beat, International Alert and guest authors.

RESOURCES

Factbook, Readings, Events

This collection of resources complements and extends the analysis of the report. It contains an interactive factbook allowing users to explore case studies from around the world and provides background readings and contextualized report and event summaries.

Thematic Reading

Logo - G7 GermanyG7 Germany
Logo_AdelphiAdelphi
Logo - International AlertInternational Alert
Logo - Wilson CenterThe Wilson Center
New Security Beat climate change cooperation democracy and governance environment environmental peacemaking environmental security European Union

Europe Takes the Lead in Climate, Energy, and Security

09 August, 2018 by Zoe Dutton
European-Commission

With the tumultuous NATO summit and a simmering trade war dominating stateside headlines last month, the European Union’s progress on climate-security connections has received little attention. After the U.S. government rolled back its significant efforts in early 2017, the EU and its leading members—particularly Sweden and Germany—picked up the ball. Three significant events herald what could be the start of a new era of climate-security policymaking—one under European leadership.

UN Security Council Debates Climate-Security Connections

On July 11, the UN Security Council debated the security implications of climate change for the first time since 2011. This debate was the culmination of Sweden’s full-court press to integrate climate change into the work of the UN Security Council during its two-year term as a non-permanent member. Representatives from several countries and UN Deputy Secretary‑General Amina Mohammed testified to the security impact of environmental events in their homelands. The event created momentum that 2019’s non-permanent members—in particular Germany and Belgium—can build upon next year.

“We must understand climate change as one issue in a web of factors that can lead to conflict,” said Mohammed, who accompanied a United Nations-African Union delegation to the conflict-affected Lake Chad region. “Within this web, climate change acts as a threat multiplier, applying additional stress on prevailing political, social, and economic pressure points.  As the Executive Secretary of the Lake Chad Basin Commission said to me during our visit:  ‘At the end of the day what was the origin of this conflict?  The disappearance of the lake was a key factor.’”

A 2017 UN Secretary-General’s report on Lake Chad conflict failed to cite the environmental factors in the crisis, spurring the Swedish government and the G7 to support research that identifies and assesses the region’s climate-fragility risks.

“It is time for the Security Council to catch up with the changing reality on the ground,” said Margot Wallström, the Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs, at the July 11 session. “And, it is past time for us to deepen our understanding of how climate change interacts with drivers of conflict.” She called for “improved tools, analysis, and reporting from the field,” including climate risk assessments and early warning, as well as an “institutional home for these issues within the UN system.” This summer, Sweden will launch a knowledge hub for climate security in Stockholm to help inform the UN.

Europe Commits to Energy Efficiency

The UN debate came on the heels of the European Commission’s celebration of “European Climate Diplomacy Week” in June, which concluded with the European Parliament, European Council, and European Commission agreeing to a new Energy Efficiency Directive, as well as new governance regulation.

The EU committed to cut carbon-dioxide emissions by at least 40 percent by 2030, as well as set a binding renewable energy target of 32 percent. These new deals are the latest step in Europe’s ongoing effort to improve its energy efficiency to meet the goals laid out in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement.

Maros Šefčovič, the Vice President of the European Commission and head of the Energy Union, applauded the decision. He said it emphasized Europe’s commitment to “lead the clean energy transition” undaunted by the United States’ “disappointing” 2017 withdrawal from the Paris agreement.

As Europe works to position itself as the global leader on environmental initiatives, it offers an important counterweight to China’s own recent attempts to dominate the arena. At the same time, the United States’ failure to join in these efforts means it is losing a key opportunity to assert itself on the international stage and establish its leadership on a geopolitical issue of growing importance—and  strengthen its relationships with European allies.

Setting the Bar for Climate, Peace and Security

At another Climate Week event, “Climate, Peace and Security: The Time for Action,” European security leaders emphasized the shared responsibility to mitigate climate-security risks, and offered suggestions for how countries could effectively integrate climate, security, and development policy initiatives.

“We are setting the bar even higher because we know we have the responsibility, as Europeans, to lead by example in a world that needs actors and players in the world that can do that and that have the intention to do that,” said Federica Mogerhini, the European High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Vice President of the European Commission, in her keynote address. “Climate change has an impact on everyone’s security, and international cooperation is the only possible way to address such common challenges.”

Mogerhini cited desertification and extreme weather events, such as the 2017 floods in the Horn of Africa, as environmental factors that have exacerbated conflict. Around the world, “climate impacts have displaced more people than war,” she said. “The Paris Agreement is—and we believe, must remain—our first line of defense, and the indispensable foundation for reaching climate neutrality in the second half of this century.”

However, EU member states still have a ways to go before they meet the Paris agreement’s goals. In a report released last September, the German government acknowledged that it would miss its 2020 climate goal of reducing emissions by 40 percent, and likely only achieve 32 percent—at best—  compared to 1990 levels. According to Climate Action Network Europe, no European state is on track to meet its Paris commitments.

There are some promising signs: Since 2007, European carbon dioxide emissions have decreased by about 12 percent. But such measures can only be truly effective at combating climate change—and ensuring a peaceful future–if the rest of the world joins in.